Government shutdown 2025 Nov 15, 2025
The government has been shut down for the past almost month and a half due to a funding disagreement.  As an employee of the federal government, I've been sort of unemployed this whole time.  Certain projects at work were in an "excepted" state which meant work was to continue as normal, while other projects were simply put on pause until funding resumed.  Some people have been doing absolutely nothing, while other people have been going to the office and working full-time.  I lucked out due to my funding level on one of those projects, and only had to work "to my allotment" which was 25%, which meant I did two hours of work per day and then called it a day.  If there's any doubt about this type of work schedule, I can firmly state this is the ideal amount of work that should be attempted in one day.  Two hours is enough to focus on something, make some progress, maybe complete a thing, and then call it quits.  It's the perfect work/life balance. 

The only downside was that we weren't getting paid.  There was an expectation that we would get paid after the shutdown ended, and this was even codified as a law after a previous shutdown.  But I no longer have confidence in the government's ability or willingness to follow laws.  Working without pay is fine for a short time, but it brings up some interesting questions after a while.  Like, how long do I feel like working without getting paid, and how hard do I feel like working?  At what point should I consider a different job, preferably one that pays me?  Because as much as I like my job, at the end of the day, it's a job.  If I didn't have to work for a living, I wouldn't.  If I could devote my time to something while not getting paid, it wouldn't be my job. 

But the other interesting question was:  What the hell should I do with my time?  It's hard to predict when a government shutdown will end, so you don't want to make any big future plans or anything.  So I mostly did nothing with my newfound free time.  I played video games, watched TV.  Standard things I would do with my downtime in pseudo-vacation mode.  But after a couple weeks, I decided I should probably be productive in some form, so I did a few house projects that have been waiting around for months.  Again, even with two hours of work and a few hours of home improvement work, it's still a great work/life balance. 

Which, by the way, I think the last time I had this much free time in my life was when I was maybe 15 years old, before I started working a summer job.  After that point, it was work, high school, college, summer internships, and then a full-time job.  High school and college weren't easy, stress-free times for me, so I've basically been "on" for the past 28 years straight. 

The source of the government shutdown was a disagreement between the president's budget proposal and congress's acceptance of that bill.  Now that the furlough is over, government employees have been assured they will receive back pay both for the actual work they did and also for the work they didn't do, i.e. they'll be paid for not working.  As a taxpayer, this is an absurd situation.  But as a government employee who had no say in whether or not the government was shut down, it's a no-brainer.  Pay me what you owe me, bitch.  I signed up for this job, I've created a life based around receiving a certain annual salary.  A political disagreement is honestly not my fucking problem.  And honestly it's a weird situation, where it's unclear who benefits from a government shutdown.  Surely the government workers don't benefit, and neither do the businesses and restaurants and all manner of other trickle-down economic players who aren't receiving that routine flow of cash.  But also the taxpayers don't benefit because not only are those tax dollars still being spent, you're also not getting the work production value out of them.  As far as I can tell, the only people who benefit are the small-brained politicians who get to essentially take hostage the entire national economic apparatus to exercise their silly little power plays. #politics
Football shape Nov 8, 2025
I think it's funny that the literal shape of the ball plays an important part in the game of football.  Most other ball sports that I can think of off the top of my head (baseball, basketball, soccer, tennis, golf) have balls that are spheres, so the shape doesn't really come into play.  The texture (basketball), seams (baseball), and material (golf) all play a role, but not the shape.  A football is weird because it's oblong and pointy.  It makes it easy for a quarterback to throw, a ball-carrier to hold, and a receiver to catch.  But if the ball bounces off the ground, it literally exhibits unpredictable, random motion.  Sometimes that's good if you're punting or kicking and don't want the other team to have the ball.  But other times it's bad if you're trying to scoop up a fumble.  It's never not funny watching a group of large, athletic men chase around an chaotically bouncing ball. #sports
Brief History of Windows Oct 5, 2025
I've been using Microsoft Windows since version 3.1, when it was just a thing that ran on top of MS-DOS.  Then with Windows 95 it replaced MS-DOS as the operating system on your computer.  Windows 98 essentially introduced the Blue Screen of Death.  Windows 2000 mostly fixed that, and it was clean and wonderful.  Windows XP made everything bubbly, but still good.  There was a period of time in those days when Windows was stable and usable and everything felt good, but you had to download third-party software to do things like view pictures and videos (and different software for different filetypes!), and to do simple/standard things like open zip files.  I think I skipped Windows Vista, or it was unmemorable, but either way around this version or Windows 7, everything started to become baked in.  You didn't have to download any other software to do the things you do on a computer.  I would say this was the pinnacle of Windows.  I think I skipped Windows 8, but Windows 10 was essentially more of the same, though perhaps a little cleaner.  We're now at Windows 11, and things have changed.  If you haven't upgraded from Windows 10 to Windows 11, your computer will tell you, it will repeatedly remind you even if you tell it to stop asking, and it will nag you until you throw it in a dumpster out of frustration.  Windows 11 changed a bunch of functionality, removed a bunch of configurable settings, and introduced AI as a core component of the operating system.  There's even AI in Notepad, the simplest, most straightforward piece of software ever conceived, ruined by a half-baked, unnecessary, unhelpful, undesirable piece of forced technology. 

Throughout its lifetime, Windows started out as a clunky add-on, became buggy, became the industry standard, fixed its bugs, became its true self, and then deteriorated into a worthless pile of garbage foisted on its global user base by techno-futurist zealots.  An operating system isn't the piece of technology people want to interact with.  When I use a computer, I want to use software, I want to write, create, learn.  The operating system is simply the skeleton that holds everything up.  If I have to fight with my operating system to force it to allow me to do what I want to do, it no longer has any value for me.  Windows has become a nuisance, a paper cut, a broken bone.  I guess it was inevitable, but it's still sad to see. #technology
Figure it out Aug 28, 2025
I work with a contractor who was delivering numerical data and asking for feedback from my group.  We use the data in a very precise way, but his data only had three digits after the decimal point.  So naturally we requested more digits.  His response was that the software he used to generate the data was only capable of outputting data with three digits after the decimal point.  This software, by the way, was written by his company.  It's not overly complex software, and it was likely written by a person who sits right next to him at work.  But he was adamant that this ask was simply unachievable. 

Not all problems are solvable, and most of the rest of them are hard.  But with the amount of money we pay this guy and the level of intelligence he brings to the table (now questionable), I would've liked to have said one simple thing:  Figure.  It.  Out.  FIGURE IT OUT.  Find a way to solve this problem.  You're smart.  You have resources at your disposal.  You've done all this other complex work.  Figure it out.  Open your code editor and change the format string of the print statement from %3.3f to %3.6f.  Every single other person working on this program and in this entire industry knows this and knows how to do it.  Do it.  "Not possible" is not an option, especially at this level, and especially with this task.  Figure it out.
On AI Aug 11, 2025
Artificial intelligence is everywhere now, for better or worse.  It's interesting to watch how it polarizes people; you're either an AI evangelist or a luddite.  I tend to try to avoid the latest fad, which is why I completely avoided bitcoin and NFTs.  But after some hesitation, I've found some AI tools to be insanely useful.  It all depends on what you're trying to do and how you want to do it.  To paraphrase something I read somewhere, technology is supposed to make our jobs easier so we have more time for creativity, not make creativity easier so we have more time for our jobs.  The use cases I've heard for AI, aside from writing (and grading) school papers, include writing emails, summarizing documents, and drafting performance plans.  These all seem like mediocre ways to use a powerful technology, but whatever.  What I've found is that an AI tool functions well as an improved search engine.  When I'm working on some hard coding problem, I've always kept a browser tab open to look up questions about syntax, errors, or whatnot.  A search engine would inevitably point me to one of a handful of message boards where someone else had asked the same question months, years, or decades ago.  So my task became:  Filter through search results to find the most relevant (while discarding the irrelevant) to cobble together a solution to my problem.  AI can simply do this part for me.  And it can write code.  It still requires a human to organize that code into something workable, and it requires a human to ask the questions in the first place.  But a big chunk of the tedious middle part can be avoided entirely with AI. 

I think most of the hate for AI comes (rightly) from the force-fed nature of it.  There's AI in search engines, shopping websites, browsers, documents, apps, operating systems, phones, home appliances, a toilet, etc.  Every website on the planet now has an AI-powered "assistant."  It's often more difficult to avoid AI than to just begrudgingly use it.  And that's the problem most people have:  There's no choice in the matter.  Tech companies are shoving this concept down our throats, and it all comes off as very Microsoft Clippy-esque -- that super annoying "assistant" in Microsoft Office programs that would try to guess what you doing (wrongly) and try to offer assistance (poorly), really only serving as a thing that got in the way of what you were actually trying to do.  People mostly want freedom to do things as they wish, to express themselves in whatever nonoptimal, convoluted means they see fit.  Technology that gets in the way of creativity is not only not helpful, it's detrimental. 

But also, people hate AI because it sucks.  If you look carefully (or not that carefully), you see it used everywhere -- to create movies, commercials, viral videos, art, etc.  And that's mostly fine, aside from how bad it is at times.  The problem is that humanity already isn't good at determining what's true and what's not, what's fake and what's real.  And as these tools improve, and as more and more people gain access to them, it's concerning to imagine the world we'll be living in with ubiquitous AI-generated viral media available constantly, instantly, and universally. #technology
CTE brain May 3, 2025
Chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or CTE, is a brain disease achieved by getting hit on the head a lot, and it's usually found in football players and boxers.  Some of the symptoms include impulsive behavior and aggression. 

It's a real thing, and I don't mean to make light of it.  But there's a pattern of behavior I've noticed in certain public figures in recent years that suggests something similar is happening to otherwise healthy people.  There was the football player Antonio Brown who walked off the field (i.e. quit) mid-game in a pretty dramatic fashion (though that might've actually been CTE).  There was the Dilbert creator Scott Adams who used to post benign little things on his blog and Twitter, but who has since devolved into a racist and an extreme fear-mongerer.  There's also Jordan Peterson, who achieved notoriety with a fairly benign self-help book, but who has since become an aggressively annoying Twitter personality.  Add to this list JK Rowling, who earned a billion dollars as a young adult author, but whose entire public life now consists of degrading transgender people for some reason.  And then there's Elon Musk, who used to be an awkward nerd but has since become a Nazi.  Also, Donald Trump. 

You could claim these people are just doing things for attention.  Or maybe that's how these people have always been, and social media has simply allowed them to be more visible about it.  But I think it's something else.  It might be that, similar to CTE, social media has altered peoples' brain to make them act more impulsive and aggressive.  Or it might be drugs (Elon) or supplements (Adams -- men that old shouldn't have abs).  I don't know what it is, but I don't like it, and I think social media should be abolished and people should have to obtain a license to use the internet. #psychology
Autism spectrum May 3, 2025
This is probably wrong, but if autism truly is a spectrum, it would sort of make sense that everyone is on this spectrum, similar to the spectrum of gender or sexuality.  You can't be on or off the spectrum; you're on it.  If this is the case, most people are on the low end of the spectrum, i.e. not very autistic.  The people we think of as "having autism" are on the high end.  That leaves a whole bunch of people in the middle, which would maybe help explain people with difficulty making eye contact, sensory sensitivities, and things like that.  In other words, I think we're all a little autistic. #psychology
Mirror bacteria May 3, 2025
This People I (Mostly) Admire podcast episode introduced me to the concept of mirror bacteria (or mirror life) which is the idea that biology uses molecules of a specific chirality, i.e. molecular formations that are either right-handed or left-handed.  The same chemical can exist in either form, but all biology tends to use molecules of a specific handedness, e.g. proteins are exclusively composed of left-handed amino acids.  There's a scary idea out there that if left-handed bacteria suddenly evolved or were created in a lab, the human immune system would be unable to defend itself because it evolved to recognize right-handed bacteria only. #science
More than five senses May 3, 2025
The traditional "five senses" we learned in grade school (via Aristotle) -- sight, smell, touch, taste, and hearing -- are associated with specific sensor organs on the human body:  eyes, ears, skin, nose, and tongue.  But it's widely established now that there are more than five senses.  Temperature can be sensed by the skin or tongue, but it's different than simply sense of touch.  Balance and body orientation are sensed by the inner ear.  You can sense when you're moving versus stationary.  I would add a couple weird ones to the list:  You can often sense when someone is standing close to you, or if they're looking at you. #science
Finding concerts Apr 16, 2025
I'm always kind of surprised how difficult it is to find concerts I might be interested in, and how bad the search engines are at performing this seemingly simple task.  When I go to a website of a concert venue or ticket seller, I can scroll through their list of upcoming events, but it's a total mishmash of every style of music from every generation.  And when I make the unfortunate decision to buy a ticket for a concert I want to attend, I get automatically signed up to receive emails from the ticket seller that say, "Hey, since you're going to a concert, would you be interested in going to a completely unrelated concert simply for the pleasure of experiencing the sensation of live music?"  Like, no.  If I go to death metal concert, I'm not interested in going to a techno concert simply because both things fit neatly into the box of "live music."  That's not how that works, that's not how anything works, and I feel like this issue should've been resolved in like 2002.  How can I not simply select "live music" from a drop-down box, then further select "music that contains a guitar" vs. "music that involves a DJ"?  These are not overlapping Venn diagrams, and I shouldn't have to tell the likes of TicketMaster how to serve me the content I actually want to pay money for.  Use those ticket fees for something good, you dorks. #music